Thread: Favorite weapon????

I don't really give a crap which weapons is the best and which one pwns all. I take the gun that makes the game most fun for me: the Assault Rifle. One reason I like it is because I like it's relative precision to pick off Smokers. Before you go like "but I can be more precise with the uberl33t AS HURHURHUR" yes I know some people think the AS is as precise, but it isn't for me. I am more precise with the AR than I am with the AS. I've shot Hunters of pounced teammates from a far distance more than once using the AR. Some of the sore losers call me hacker because "ZOMG u hax aimbot! u shot me from afar lol hax moar plz lol"

I use a gun because it's fun to use not because it's teh uberleet pwnage gun.

Originally Posted by Acermors

Another one crushed by Beery's walls of text. :rofl:

Writing can only succeed if the arguments are persuasive. In order for an argument to be persuasive it has to address the opponent's points in detail. If people can't be bothered to respond, except with avoidance or ad hominem attacks, then they deserve to lose the argument. I have no sympathy whatsoever for those who are quick to speak up, but then can't (or won't) defend their position.

And anyone who thinks a paragraph is by definition more 'oppressive' than a sentence is an anti-intellectual. I believe anti-intellectualism went out of style at the beginning of this year when the Dufus in Chief left the White House.

Originally Posted by Beery

Writing can only succeed if the arguments are persuasive. In order for an argument to be persuasive it has to address the opponent's points in detail. If people can't be bothered to respond, except with avoidance or ad hominem attacks, then they deserve to lose the argument. I have no sympathy whatsoever for those who are quick to speak up, but then can't (or won't) defend their position.

And anyone who thinks a paragraph is by definition more 'oppressive' than a sentence is an anti-intellectual. I believe anti-intellectualism went out of style at the beginning of this year.

Are you... talking to me?

Seriously dude, you want to hear my argumentation? Here is my argumentation: I have more fun with the AR than I have with the AS. For what reason? I don't really know. I just know I enjoy my game more with the AR. Considering the fact that I bought the game to have fun and that I'm simply better with the AR than I am with the AS just leads me to the conclusion that I prefer using the AR.
That other people prefer the AS for reason X or reason Y is the least of my concerns.
You prefer the Autoshottie? Good for you. Hell what do I care what gun you play with, as long as you have fun and don't become a terrible liability to your team.

Originally Posted by Beery

Writing can only succeed if the arguments are persuasive. In order for an argument to be persuasive it has to address the opponent's points in detail. If people can't be bothered to respond, except with avoidance or ad hominem attacks, then they deserve to lose the argument. I have no sympathy whatsoever for those who are quick to speak up, but then can't (or won't) defend their position.

And anyone who thinks a paragraph is by definition more 'oppressive' than a sentence is an anti-intellectual. I believe anti-intellectualism went out of style at the beginning of this year when the Dufus in Chief left the White House.

And Pseudo in Chief came to the White House