Thread: Late Night Playage

Originally Posted by assistndestroy

Don't knock it til you try it? I've been told that dog tastes something like lamb. Or was it the other way around? Either way, I haven't been really craving any rack of lamb, or lamb chops since.

At my dad's house we eat lamb almost every week.

I'm a bit confused since TP never seemed to show up in the forums when I joined, it kinda feels like he's introducing himself again. :rofl:

But according to what else I heard from you, the forums will be a place of darkness

Welcome back to the throne I guess. :waves:

Originally Posted by The_friendly_smoker

but would anyone mind explaining what the charade between MNDF and "definitelynotbetty" was about?

Originally Posted by Genericck

This is what I was thinking about.

Lols.

Originally Posted by MyNameDidntFit

Lols.

Thank you for your wonderful and in-depth explanation that was clearly an asset to the L4DF community.

Give yourself a pat on the back.

Originally Posted by The_friendly_smoker

Thank you for your wonderful and in-depth explanation that was clearly an asset to the L4DF community.

Give yourself a pat on the back.

That is a very nice compliment.

definitelynotbetty is definitely not betty because the username said so.

Originally Posted by The_friendly_smoker

Thank you for your wonderful and in-depth explanation that was clearly an asset to the L4DF community.

Give yourself a pat on the back.

How would you like me to expand on it? I can write you a paragraph or two that will say the same thing, if you wish?

Here, let me try this: after the initial reaction to Betty's banning, she decided to create an alternate account so she could check out the reaction that I mentioned to her. Whilst doing so, we decided it would be decidedly amusing were she to insinuate that not only was I responsible for the ban, but also that she was pissed about the aforementioned banishment. From there, we simply fell into the age old practice of throwing pictures back and forth that we both found highly beneficial to our amusement levels. This came to a stop when we grew somewhat bored of the endeavour.

This led to what you see now, me explaining that which I have already explained--far more concisely, and no less accurately, for that matter--to you, who have already read the previously mentioned concise explanation that preceded the one hereto enclosed in a highly sarcastic, and mildly amusing for my part, response to your own highly sarcastic, and presumably somewhat amusing for you, response.



Now, will you require a further expansion on the topic, or will this suffice?