Awp vote counterstrike source.

**rock_lobster** · 01-05-09, 09:39 PM

Originally Posted by DuDDy

civil its the subtle art of smokes and flashes, couple here and there and bam no more effective awper. its not that hard like everyone makes it out to be.

Duddy will you marry me?

**rock_lobster** · 01-05-09, 09:40 PM

Originally Posted by Fajita!

Shut up rock, and get better at CS. ;D

Lonestar for CS should be coming out soon, I'll talk to the rabbit about switching the places of "yes" and "no".

I've been on lately, and believe me, I ain't no slouch at this game. :2

**Latinman** · 01-05-09, 09:40 PM

I'm just pointing out that awp is part of the game. The game designers put the gun in there for a reason. Mods also are there to restrict it. I'm just asking that a vote NOT come up every time an awp is used by people who know how to handle the weapon. I mean if you have the right mod you can restrict it to 1 awp per team lots of servers do that make everyone happy.. Or who know's 2 awps per team. I think it's unfair to the players trying to play the game that was meant to be played when a weapon is restricted simply because joe blow doesnt feel like dying to a particular weapon... You could compare the awp to runway strafing (is allowed was in motd) in bf2 its cheap but it's not banned on the servers. LOTS of servers see that as "bannable" but hey Im just showing you in certain games you don't care but others you do??

**RudyTheRocka** · 01-05-09, 09:42 PM

Originally Posted by DuDDy

civil its the subtle art of smokes and flashes, couple here and there and bam no more effective awper. its not that hard like everyone makes it out to be.

I agree with Duddy, Rage, Rock, and Fajita.
Anyone who has read my posts knows I like the awp and use it in scrims. Why? Because I like the AWP style and quite simply, it gets the job done. CS:S is about objective and killing and whatnot..but when it comes down to it, it's about WINNING THE ROUND. So the AWP is how I choose to do it.

Originally Posted by rock_lobster

I hear smack talk about how great everyone here is at css, yet they ban weapons that present a challenge to them.

Rock just earned 10000000 points.

**RudyTheRocka** · 01-05-09, 09:46 PM

Another thing, last time I checked, the server title does NOT say "NO AWP/AUTO" so why should we vote on it when we hear a scary shot?

**Rage!** · 01-05-09, 09:47 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

Then the losing team starts bitching and whining that they are getting AWPed back.

so your telling me, just because a couple of people don't know how to deal with the awp and cry about it, we have to restrict it? seriously, thats just dumb. if we didn't PAMPER all these whiny people and just allowed them to start dealing with it, the complaints would go down.

people would start working on better strats to get around the awpers like duddy pointed out.

**CivilWars** · 01-05-09, 09:49 PM

The good news is with LS, which is coming soon, there is a revote option. Accidentally hit 1, all you need to do is type revote in chat,and you get to vote again. This works in TF2, so I am sure it will carry over.

Rage,

Everyone gets a vote. If 50% or more want to play with/against it then it will be in play. Don't blame the admins when over 50% have to vote yes to restrict it. If you want to call players chumps, pussies, or whatever for restricting it so be it, but don't blame the admins.

**Latinman** · 01-05-09, 09:50 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

The good news is with LS, which is coming soon, there is a revote option. Accidentally hit 1, all you need to do is type revote in chat,and you get to vote again. This works in TF2, so I am sure it will carry over.

Rage,

Everyone gets a vote. If 50% or more want to play with/against it then it will be in play. Don't blame the admins when over 50% have to vote yes to restrict it. If you want to call players chumps, pussies, or whatever for restricting it so be it, but don't blame the admins.

thats great, now when we ask for an unrestrict vote can we get one? I mean if ONE person complains about the awp the vote is thrown up.. So what about ONE person saying that we need to unrestrict it after the round is over?

**RudyTheRocka** · 01-05-09, 09:51 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

The good news is with LS, which is coming soon, there is a revote option. Accidentally hit 1, all you need to do is type revote in chat,and you get to vote again. This works in TF2, so I am sure it will carry over.

Point made and taken. I was not aware that this would be in CSS.

**rock_lobster** · 01-05-09, 09:53 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

The good news is with LS, which is coming soon, there is a revote option. Accidentally hit 1, all you need to do is type revote in chat,and you get to vote again. This works in TF2, so I am sure it will carry over.

Rage,

Everyone gets a vote. If 50% or more want to play with/against it then it will be in play. Don't blame the admins when over 50% have to vote yes to restrict it. If you want to call players chumps, pussies, or whatever for restricting it so be it, but don't blame the admins.

I agree with that. I don't blame an admin for doing his/her job. I have beef with players who are babied with these votes. Like rage said, if we didn't have a vote at all, the skill level on this server would skyrocket, new strats and rushes would emerge, and a whole new level of teamplay would evolve by having to overcome a difficult obstacle as a team.

I will say this though, once enough time has elapsed after an awp vote passes, I would like to see requests to have it unbanned be acknowledged. If the server still votes it to be restricted then, so be it.