Concerned Player

**Taco_Rocket** · 12-13-09, 07:00 PM

I love playing on your guys servers, but a thing that troubles me is that admins refuse to increase fun in the gameplay. Now before i get flamed let me explain. Most of the times on the CSS server (regular I believe) admins will throw down requests to balance teams or get an awp or auto vote when people request it. Normally these admins are on the other team (most likely the winning team) and will not do it for the sake of winning instead of making it fair.
I just want someone to keep an eye and make unbiased decisions for the server

**Arreo** · 12-13-09, 07:02 PM

Wait... your are complaining because the admins are balancing the teams and listening to players' requests? ???

Or are you saying that the admins don't put up the votes if they are winning?

**Fajita!** · 12-13-09, 07:20 PM

I'm reasonably sure it was the former, on D2 he got mad that the admin threw up an auto vote, and started saying they should throw up a scout vote or something.

http://texasteamplayers.hlstatsx.com...&player=182335

**flame** · 12-13-09, 08:10 PM

off topic, but reading his chat, planting in water is illegal? didnt know that. carry on

**QuickLightning** · 12-13-09, 08:15 PM

Originally Posted by flame

off topic, but reading his chat, planting in water is illegal? didnt know that. carry on

Planting in the water on Inferno will sometimes cause disruptions during the defusal for the CT team as the fish pass between the player and the bomb. It is considered an illegal plant because of this.

TC - You will also need to give a lot more information about your abuse claim if you want it to really go anywhere. Specifics come in handy...

**Taco_Rocket** · 12-16-09, 02:59 PM

I was a little frustrated (you can tell by my language) that whenever there would be some sort of imbalance, there would be no correction. I am just talking about how there needs to be more unbiased decisions for the servers.
The AWP votes and Autosniper votes would not come when requested for fairness and when they did come was when a losing team would be using them and an admin on the other team was just not happy with Counter-Terrorists countering with snipers when there was a plant on boat. Making it easier for the admin's team (that was already winning) to profusely keep winning. That is all.

**FragRaptor** · 12-16-09, 03:38 PM

You explained in 2 sentences?

Taco if you want this to go anywhere you need to explain in something like 2 paragraphs not 2 sentences. Also I don't think many people thought your language sounded frustrated. I don't think you are communicating this well, this is coming from a person who has had trouble communicating in the past, and some in the present.

2 paragraphs in much more of a statement than 2 sentences. It shows that you mean to tell of a thought through complaint of the server. If you don't it really just feels to some people to be a pointless thread which is finished quickly and done with.

I hope you can get your point across better. But even if so I really don't see the problem with the winning team trying to balance the team (Normally that would be the team protesting against the team balance), as for AWP votes... So much for the 3rd server would change the threads.

GL in your case, good or bad, don't ruin your stay here.

**...bigdog...** · 12-16-09, 04:22 PM

this is totally without merit. anecdotes and hearsay. either you bring up a specific admin's name, map, time...or there is no charge here.

saying "I wish admins were more fair", or " I wish votes were applied fairly"......is rhetorical. We wish the same, and we push our admins harder than you can imagine to not only enforce the rules, but refrain from enforcing rules as much as possible, and let the players work out their issues. Next time you have a problem, take some screenshots of what the admins are or are not saying in response to your requests.

But coming in here and saying "PMG the admin put up a vote because he was losing to my awp skillzorozlol"......dude....grow up. And if that's not what you meant to say, so what. That's what you said.