Results 11 to 20 of 21
Thread: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
-
03-01-11, 06:04 PM #11
Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
The admin on T side doesn't wish to be outed on this occasion, but he does have this to say.
"Plain and simple, even when it is a slow play, you should be supporting the bomb, not awping an area that won't help the bomb get planted."
I completely agree with them 100%.
-
03-01-11, 06:10 PM #12
Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
what does this mean?
it sounds like you are saying we should be following the bomb on a slowplay while sitting in the rear and i thought a slow play meant to spread out and try to get some picks and/or scope out the least protected path until a proper call is made to move out.
i just want clarification as this comment confused me.
-
03-01-11, 06:11 PM #13
Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
This is what I was doing when you slayed me:
1. Following the call
2. Protecting my teammates
3. Communicating where the enemy is
I'm still confused why I got slayed.
-
03-01-11, 06:19 PM #14
Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
Firstly cojiro, I don't see your relevance in this admin abuse claim.
Secondly, I wasn't the one to make this comment.
Thirdly, from what I understand, what the other admin is trying to say is that, even if there is a slowplay call in the beginning of the round, generally the call with adapt to how many picks you get at a certain place on the map.
Here's what the other admin has to say about this.
"Yes that is what a slow play is, but we were a minute into the round. The bomb was PUSHING INTO B. At that time everyone should be advancing their postions to support the bomb. The call was made, "Bomb is pushing into B". I know because I made it."
@Whitelobster, You were slayed for sitting back and watching the flank while the rest of your team, minus the other teammate who was sitting in middle awping with you, was pushing into the site.
It honestly isn't that confusing.
-
03-01-11, 06:26 PM #15
Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
If I was hiding in lower A or in T spawn I would understand, but that wasn't the case. I wish there was video evidence to back me up but I guess I'm outnumbered here.
-
03-01-11, 06:28 PM #16
Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
Yes and no. When your team moves the bomb to a site you should be with the team, or at least make a good effort to get there.
What this situation looks like is Lobsters team was moving the Bomb, but you stayed in water to get kills instead of heading to the site. Somthing that apperently had been going on with you all map, I would have slayed too. Clear cut case.
Now that that's been said...you're first post reeks of pub-stardom. For someone who's been here as long as you, I would expect more than that bs post. To suggest our admins slay cause you were winning or cause you killed one of them? Seriously, you need to watch the things you say, and the way you say them. That is what admins look at when voting on your situation, and right now you're losing points.
-
- Join Date
- 06-14-10
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,656
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 1
03-01-11, 06:32 PM #17Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
You were in water for a minute into the round. The bomb and many others were pushing B tunnels. I had the bomb that round, and I specifically said, "I'm pushing into site." What good are you doing, sitting in water, while the bomb is pushing into B site? You didn't want to move from your postion because you are sitting back "getting rotators"? I'm pretty sure that is what we call camping and that is why the awp is restricted most of the time. There were plenty of us watch bridge from B tunnels. We didn't need someone in water watching spiral. Yes it was a slow play round, but like I said before, a whole minute and probably even more had gone by. And at this time all Terrorists should be pushing to take a site.
Yes a slow play should be were people spread out and wait to get picks, but we had already done that. It was time to make a aggressive move and you were in water doing nothing to help us take B site. Admins can't police every single player, every single round. To do that we would need an admin for every non-admin playing. There were only two admins on.
Most importantly is the Admin Disrespect issue. Not only did you disrespect an admin, but also FireDragon IMO. If you want to question our decisions, bring it here, don't type in anger which is what you did. And Firedragon typed, "I would rage quit too if I were slayed for the wrong reason." So you are saying that the admin made the wrong decision, letting everyone know in the server? Do not question an admin in server, question them here.
This could have been easily handled, but you had to have an anger outburst. And that is why you are banned.
-
03-01-11, 06:49 PM #18
Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
people were commenting on lobsters RQ, my exact words were "i'd rage if I got slayed when i shouldnt have". which is a true statement, no player on this server can deny that.
I was not trying to question the admins decision. I know the forums are where to go... been playing here long enough.
-
- Join Date
- 06-14-10
- Location
- Chicago, IL
- Posts
- 6,656
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 1
03-01-11, 07:04 PM #19Re: Admin abuse in the CSS pub
Yes and so you are saying that the Admin slayed him when they shouldn't have...thus saying the admins decision is wrong. This is not acceptable in the servers and you may have gotten of the hook this time, but I suggest you be more careful with your wording, no matter what you meant. There are some admins who have zero tolerance for that type of behavior.
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks